The company’s files, not a CMS inbox
Docs, products, and cases are the source of truth. When those files change, the public pages should follow. The site is a view of the company, not a second set of facts to keep in sync by hand.
Aperanda’s own operating loop — not a client example. The company’s files are the source of truth. Agents propose and apply updates. A person still signs what must be reviewed.
The site stays aligned. The publishing backlog shrinks.
No named client. No euro figure. This is the process we run on aperanda.com itself.
Docs, products, and cases are the source of truth. When those files change, the public pages should follow. The site is a view of the company, not a second set of facts to keep in sync by hand.
Agents read the sources, draft the page-level change, and apply what is already decided. They do not invent clients, metrics, or prices. The public surface ships in English and Russian (Spanish is next); locked Work examples stay untouched.
The site stays current because the loop is the maintenance. The team spends less time rewriting pages that already live in the company files. That is the cost we cut — hours on the site, not a decorated ROI.
A person still reviews and signs what must be reviewed — prices, legal copy, named claims. Agents maintain the rest. We do not claim unsupervised publishing of everything.
We can build you the same kind of self-updating site — and reduce the team’s cost of keeping the pages current. Same source-of-truth loop we run here. Run the free estimate; we will not invent a euro saving for this offer.