← Back to Work
Process file · Logistics Logistics

What’s inside: connections to your systems · assistants

POD photos into tracking on arrival, not at shift-end

The question this file answersIs our tracking current, or is it whatever the clerk managed to type from the photos before going home?

Fits: carriers and forwarders whose dispatch documents still arrive as PDFs and photos.

Typical day

What the desk looks like today

Typical, from the logistics playbook — dispatch documents flow continuously through the day, with no count published for photos alone. Drivers send phone pictures of signed PODs. A clerk zooms in, finds the shipment, types a timestamp into tracking, and later answers the customer from a folder of JPEGs.

What changes

What Monday looks like after

At 18:00 the clerk is not typing timestamps; the deliveries of the day are already on the tracking record, and what remains is a short queue of photos too blurred to read and the refusals that need a phone call. When a customer asks, the answer is on the record, not in a folder.

Typical, not a measured client result. Every figure here comes from the playbook source named below.

~55%

less manual handling of dispatch documents — DHL pilot (2022); POD photos are inside that scope, not measured alone

Before: a clerk squints at driver photos and retypes timestamps at 18:00. After: the DHL pilot (2022) reports ~55% less manual document handling, PODs included; refusals and disputes stay a person.

Where this number comes from

A DHL internal case study (2022) reports ~55% less manual handling with AI document processing in pilot operations; the logistics playbook uses 40–60% for dispatch documents. PODs are named in that scope, photo capture is not measured separately — an industry pilot figure, not our measurement.

What we install

What we put in front of the systems you already run

Your tracking system and TMS stay — project44, FourKites, CargoWise or the portal you run. The same document build as our BOL/POD-to-tracking file, on the photo path only:

  1. photos from the driver app or the WhatsApp export are collected as they arrive
  2. the shipment reference, the time and whether a signature is present are read off the image and matched to the shipment in the TMS
  3. a clean read writes the delivery event to tracking through the API, while an unreadable photo, a missing signature or a note saying “refused” goes to the dispatcher with the image attached.
What stays human — and what this will not do

Refusals. Partial deliveries. A signature that looks wrong. The dispute that is really about the photo.

What can go wrong — and what we do about it

Photo quality is the whole game — a dark cab, a crumpled sheet, a thumb over the reference — and those read badly; they go to a person, and a one-page photo guideline for drivers does more than any model. Without a tracking API, events go in by import and are current per batch, not per photo. The DHL (2022) ~55% is for document processing in a pilot; refusals and partial deliveries are outside it.

What it costs to get there

The path: free 60-second estimate → free 20-minute review → paid audit of this one process (€1.5–3K, typically two weeks) → pilot with your people in the loop (€10–20K, weeks, not quarters). No transformation programme. Prices are public, on the services page →

Scoped in the audit — the playbook has no estimate for this exact desk.

This is about you if…
What does this mean in euros?

That depends on your volumes and wage costs — this page will not invent the number. The free 60-second estimate runs that calculation from your answers, with every multiplier sourced.

Get your free savings estimate 60 seconds · no sales call Or write first → Map a logistics process like this one — free, 60 seconds →

Not a named Aperanda client. Process file · Logistics.

Short process file. Same build as its parent file; the playbook has no separate volume or benchmark for this desk.

All process files